Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"
Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting
Share this post
Nobody can anticipate the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its finest shot. With up to date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to respond to humankind's most difficult questions.
Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less easy to determine. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at forecasting the future (and cadizpedia.wikanda.es have seen some intriguing enhancements - term paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.
For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!
Background
Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is actually on the smaller side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months back so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified area to make its finest forecast possible.
And Now ... The Important Questions
We posed the following questions to our AI and determined its response. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.
Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the ?
AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity
Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...
First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.
Some fans are excited, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly offered comments Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not attending to the speculation straight.
I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the odds and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low likelihood, perhaps around 5%, considering all aspects.
Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 79% chance
No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" move, now its just a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.
Alright, I'm attempting to determine the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it seems like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and method.
Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to perform the move. The post points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I also require to think of the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which might either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles use it.
Considering that more than five appears like a significant number however possible provided their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the likelihood that they'll use it several times, specifically if it's reliable early on.
Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?
AI Final Prediction: 65% chance
While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.
From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems substantial since it reveals he's done it before, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, archmageriseswiki.com it discusses that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That could suggest he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.
However, he's likewise involved in a fight with Drake, which might offer him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation suit from Drake, so maybe he's careful about including any controversial songs in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he might still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.
Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar may feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements during the halftime show, so there's a threat that such content may be limited or softened.
On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making strong carry on big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which might provide him more innovative freedom. Plus, his previous habits suggests he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.
But I also remember reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could suggest he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.
Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 25% chance
Lets be truthful, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the fact that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Appears like theres somewhat of a chance that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.
From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't suggest to cause offense which he really discovered it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.
Looking at the short articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who takes pleasure in eating, specifically with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the situation is on screen for a celebration.
Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?
AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity
"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially lucrative? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can take place when that coin enters the air.
Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical data that might influence this prediction.
First, I check out the articles offered. They all point out the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, asystechnik.com in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a substantial distinction.
However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually considered random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, often people weigh historic information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must consider whether this historic predisposition needs to affect the possibility.
After considering it, I choose that while the historical data shows a small preference for tails, it's not statistically considerable sufficient to move the probability away from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists however does not bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.
Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity
We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely believe the exact same. BUT, its official now because our AI says the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!
AI Reasoning:
Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite major accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of short articles that speak about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful hire current video games, specifically the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.
But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ridiculous." They state there's no proof of methodical predisposition. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might suggest there's no genuine basis or opensourcebridge.science they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.
Taking a look at the short articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, disgaeawiki.info and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have been penalized more since 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate less charges, right?
...
So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely very low. Maybe not zero since you can't dismiss every possibility, but extremely not likely.
Summary
There you have it everybody, is it even worth seeing the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and systemcheck-wiki.de see how the video game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hello, if it turns out our AI was wrong about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.
1
Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says
Aaron Barbosa edited this page 2025-02-10 02:06:22 +02:00