diff --git a/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..08ce845
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have until February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be allowed to take leave and be paid until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal staff members as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM's delayed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it so much an offer. I think it's a request to resign with a vague guarantee that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months - however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I think that's an [extremely deceptive](https://gamingjobs360.com) term to use in this circumstance. When you believe of a buyout, there's typically some sort of composed contract or a concrete offer to provide a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI:  [employment](https://library.kemu.ac.ke/kemuwiki/index.php/User:SerenaLashley2) First thing we tell them is exercise severe caution. There are no warranties contained in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the agency's probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most cautious due to the fact that leaving earlier than intended can have serious consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline . She told press reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don't wish to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they have to return in - to work. And  [employment](https://raovatonline.org/author/danniequeen/) if they do not, then they have the alternative to resign, and this [administration](https://jobsingulf.com) is very generously offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply - in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it's designed to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I believe it's attempting to pull the wool over a lot of individuals's eyes because there are no assurances. And these are people who love their [job](http://etalent.zezobusiness.com). They love the mission of the company. They strive. And today, they're dealing with extremely tough choices, specifically if they're remote. I suggest, it's really coercive.MARTIN: You state it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal obstacles simply to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so extraordinary that I believe a lot of us are still attempting to determine what to do with it. I'm not sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I'm not conscious of any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase firms to give this variety of people administrative leave. So I believe it is extremely much potentially setting the stage for difficulties since I feel OPM has actually greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an [employment](https://arbeitswerk-premium.de) lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.<br>
+<br>Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website terms of usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for additional info.<br>
+<br>NPR transcripts are developed on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text might not be in its final type and might be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule may vary. The authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio record.<br>
\ No newline at end of file