diff --git a/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..707e9c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have till February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their [jobs](https://www.jobzpakistan.info). The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be permitted to depart and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM's delayed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really do not consider it so much a deal. I think it's a request to resign with an unclear pledge that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months - but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is because there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not explain it as a buyout. I believe that's an extremely misleading term to use in this situation. When you consider a buyout, there's normally some sort of written agreement or a concrete offer to [provide](https://www.topdubaijobs.ae) a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your advice, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout extreme care. There are no warranties included in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the firm's most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of worker who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than [planned](https://www.yogatraveljobs.com) can have major effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don't desire to return to the office. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they have to return in - to work. And if they don't, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is really kindly using to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply - in a way, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it's developed to get folks who work really difficult to resign. I think it's attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals's eyes due to the fact that there are no guarantees. And these are people who enjoy their task. They love the objective of the firm. They work hard. And today, they're dealing with extremely tough options, especially if they're remote. I suggest, it's extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal challenges just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be honest, is so unmatched that I believe a lot of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I'm not sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the larger question is the execution of these terms. I'm not familiar with any authority that exists right now for  [clashofcryptos.trade](https://clashofcryptos.trade/wiki/User:Merissa18J) OPM to purchase agencies to offer this number of people administrative leave. So I believe it is very much potentially setting the phase for difficulties because I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their [authority](https://www.hirecybers.com).MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.<br>
+<br>Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site terms of usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for further details.<br>
+<br>NPR records are  on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The authoritative record of NPR's programs is the audio record.<br>
\ No newline at end of file