1 Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

Adela Rowland edited this page 2025-02-21 01:20:55 +02:00

Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With as much as date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to address humankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing questions that are less easy to pin down. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some interesting improvements - research paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months ago so we have actually built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, larsaluarna.se summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified territory to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following concerns to our AI and assessed its response. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, use these estimates for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...

First, I'll look at the crucial points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not addressing the speculation straight.

I think the crucial points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the chances and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and asteroidsathome.net lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand just what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think of the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are aware of the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense appropriately, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five seems like a substantial number but possible offered their confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the strategy, and the probability that they'll utilize it a number of times, particularly if it's reliable early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears considerable due to the fact that it shows he's done it in the past, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent posts, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That could indicate he's less most likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a fight with Drake, which may offer him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation match from Drake, so perhaps he's mindful about consisting of any controversial songs in the efficiency. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the halftime show, so there's a danger that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, ura.cc Lamar has a track record of making strong carry on huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which may give him more imaginative liberty. Plus, his previous habits suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the likelihood seems to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Appears like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't mean to trigger offense and that he really found it funny himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the posts, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's an individual who takes pleasure in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, particularly if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

"Tails never fails?" You can't trick the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and thinks anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historic data that may affect this forecast.

First, I go through the short articles provided. They all point out the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has turned up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a huge distinction.

However, I remember that the result of a coin toss is normally considered random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases people weigh historical data even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I need to think about whether this historical predisposition needs to influence the possibility.

After thinking about it, I choose that while the historic data reveals a slight choice for suvenir51.ru tails, it's not statistically substantial sufficient to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists however does not bypass the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely think the same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that speak about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ current games, especially the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "absurd." They state there's no evidence of methodical bias. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're denying it, it may mean there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some reality to it.

Taking a look at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been punished more given that 2022. That's fascinating since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can't rule out every possibility, however very unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hi, if it turns out our AI was wrong about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.